🔗 Share this article

Apple could be required to allow competitors to operate their own application platforms on Apple devices across Britain, after a decision from the competition regulator.

This would be a significant change to the company's well-known "closed system" where applications can only be downloaded from the company's App Store.

But the Competition and Markets Authority has designated both the tech giants as having "strategic market status" - effectively saying they have significant control over smartphone ecosystems.

Regulatory Assessment

The regulator said the tech firms "may be limiting innovation and competition".

But the regulator clarified it did not "determine or presume misconduct" from the firms.

"The app economy generates one and a half percent of the UK's GDP and supports around four hundred thousand positions, which is why it's essential these sectors function properly for enterprises," commented a senior official from the CMA.

Around 90-100% of UK mobile devices operate using Apple or Google's mobile platforms, creating what the regulator calls an "effective duopoly".

According to current data, 48.5% of British smartphone users use an iPhone - which runs the iOS operating system - with the overwhelming bulk of the rest using the Android OS.

Apple's Reaction

The regulatory probe examined how prominent Apple and Google's own apps are compared with competitors - as well as their browsers and platform software.

It is unknown what changes the regulator will seek to implement, but previously it published guidelines detailing potential measures it could take.

These comprise mandating it to be more straightforward for people to switch between Apple and Android devices, and for both companies to list applications "in a fair, objective and transparent manner" in their marketplaces.

The Cupertino company particularly may be compelled to allow alternative app stores on its products, and let people to download programs straight from companies' websites.

This would mirror a similar ruling in the European Union, which previously imposed measures against Apple for anti-competitive behaviour.

The technology firm cautioned the United Kingdom could face delays to getting new features - as has occurred in the European Union - which the organization blames on heavy regulation.

For example, some AI capabilities which have been launched in other regions are not accessible in the European market.

"Apple encounters fierce competition in every market where we operate, and we work tirelessly to create the best products, services and customer interface," the company said in a statement.

"The UK's adoption of EU-style rules would weaken that, resulting in consumers with reduced data protection and safety, delayed access to new features, and a divided, more complicated experience."

The Search Giant's Standpoint

Google device owners can presently use alternative marketplaces - though critics say they are not as user-friendly as the company's official Play Store.

The CMA's roadmap said the search company may have to "modify the interface" of installing applications straight from websites, as well as "eliminate barriers" when using alternative app stores.

"We simply do not see the rationale for today's designation decision," a Google policy executive remarked.

The executive said "the majority" of Google device owners use third-party platforms or download apps straight from a developer's website, and asserted there is a far greater range of applications available for Google device owners versus those on Apple devices.

"Currently available are 24,000 Android phone models from 1,300 device makers worldwide, facing intense competition from Apple's platform in the UK," the spokesperson added.

Google's platform is an freely available software, which means developers can utilize and develop on top of it for free.

The company argues this means it promotes competition.

But consumer groups said curbs on these firms' dominance in other countries "are already helping enterprises to develop and providing consumers more options".

"Their dominance is now creating genuine problems by limiting options for users and competition for companies," stated a policy expert.